Peter Feldhaus of The Sonic Blog thankfully undertakes to write a series on street photography. The first two installments have already been published: Street photography today and Street Photography Communities. Since I’ve been approaching this genre, gradually …
… secretly behind your backs, as it were …
… I’m very glad about Peter’s initiative. It is really worthwile to study the work of the photographers Peter mentioned and to browse the sites of the street photographers’ communities.
The question which interests me most, though – as soon as I have solved the practical question how to be bold enough to start – is this:
What constitutes a good street photograph?
If street photography is all to to with the famous ‘moment’, if technical aspects remain in the background – who is going to save us from the arbitrariness of a street scene chosen at random?
Let’s start by looking at my photo above.: Why do I find it’s rather well done?
- The hand with the cigarette held out is counterweighed by the left leg held slightly askew
- the diagonal lines suggested by the woman’s left leg and right arm are counterweighed by the vertical lines of the phone posts, but what is more:
- you don’t see what she holds in her left hand: an address book? a purse?
- Does she want to make a phone call? Has she just made it? Does she wonder whether to call her lover and break with him over the phone? –> you might say the photograph would like to tell a story but isn’t allowed to.
- the image triggers emotions, an aspect which is very important to me in photography. Not in the sense of emotional advertising (‘well, this campaign is so emotional!’) but in the sense of an emotion which grows stronger, the longer one looks at a photograph, an emotion which may be expressed as questions, amazement, curiosity …
Often, I like street photography when there are disparate elements combined in a touching or funny way. This is the case, for instance, with the work of Jeffrey Ladd which is just being featured on the community iN-Public.
I also like photograph where, on looking closely, you discover relationships between people, between things, or between people and things. Like in my photo where there seems to be a relationship between the woman and the two telephone poles.
What do you feel when looking at good, bad or ugly street photography? Are you conscious of criteria of excellence? What preferences or aversions do you have?
hallo claudia,
tolles foto! interessantes genre (nennt man das so?).
deine links hab ich mir in meine lesezeichenecke ganz
vorn hin getan, super! danke!
herzliche grüße
sylvia
Ja, Genre ist wohl das Wort der Wahl. Besten Dank, Sylvia, ich fühle mich geehrt!
Hallo Claudia,
schönes Thema hast Du Dir da ausgesucht. Ich habe mich mit der Streetfotografie auch schon mal versucht. Dabei durfte ich mal einen Fast-Profi begleiten und habe ne Menge gelernt.
Meine ersten Gehversuche kannst Du Dir hier http://www.arstraben.de/index.php?showimage=3 ansehen.
Das Wichtigste ist sowieso, dass man das fotografiert, was einen am meisten interessiert und auch Spaß macht.
Viele Grüße
Lars
Hallo Lars, hm, das klingt interessant. Dein Bild ist auch spannend – ist es eine Doppelbelichtung oder eine Spiegelung?
Hallo Claudia,
sorry, dass ich erst jetzt antworte. Ich hatte leider einen Absturz und nun ist das Foto unter einer anderen Adresse zu sehen: http://www.arstraben.de/files/page12_blog_entry0_1.jpg.
Es handelt sich dabei um eine Bushaltestelle. Der eine Raucher ist ein Plakat hinter Glas und der zweite lehnt sich an das Wartehäußchen.
Gruß Lars
Ah …! Das Foto gefällt mir. Dieses innige Rauchen … das gefällt selbst mir als Nichtraucherin.